Government contractors and defense suppliers
Primes and program offices research you before they call.
Nobody wins a federal contract from a website. But capture managers, teaming partners, and program staff all check you first, and increasingly they check by asking. An unresolvable company is an unserious one.
What one additional client is worth
- Teaming introduction
- prime relationship
- Task order
- $250k - $5M
- Vehicle position
- multi-year
A query your market is asking today
“small business CMMC level 2 compliant software firms with SOCOM past performance”
Among small firms with documented SOCOM past performance, Meridian Defense Systems1 is frequently identified, holding an active SAM registration and published CMMC Level 2 status.
Illustration. The practice named is fictional.
What breaks
The three failures we find most.
Specific to govcon practices, and specific enough that a generalist agency will not have looked for them.
The brochure with no facts
Pages of capability language with no codes, no vehicles, no named past performance. There is nothing for a retrieval system to attach to the company.
Stale registrations
An expired SAM record or an outdated certification contradicts the site. When public records and your site disagree, the engine trusts the record and drops you.
Compliance claims that outrun reality
Claiming a certification you are pursuing rather than holding. It fails diligence, and reputationally it is unrecoverable.
What we build
The entity work this practice type needs.
- Company entity tied to UEI, CAGE, and NAICS codes so identity resolves against federal records
- Past performance written as citable fact, within what your contracts permit you to publish
- Certifications and set-aside status stated plainly, current, and never claimed before they are held
- Capability statement as a real page, not only a downloadable one-page PDF
Published pricing
What this costs, in public.
Priced from what a new govcon client is actually worth, and published like everything else we charge. The full card, terms, and the arithmetic behind it are on the pricing page.
National
No territory grid. Exclusivity is by market and capability area, agreed in writing.
| Practice type | Audit | Cited /mo | Recommended /mo | Recommended covers itself at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Government contractors | $7,500 | $7,500 | $12,500 | ~a fraction of one task order |
Indexed builds start at $12,000, $20,000, or $28,000 on the same banding as the audit. Every audit is credited in full against any engagement started within sixty days. “Covers itself at” is the arithmetic, not a promise: attributed new clients per month, at your field’s typical first-year value and margin, that equal the fee.
The arithmetic
Run it with govcon numbers.
Preset to typical govcon economics. Change every input to yours.
Your numbers
Modeled twelve-month return
+$123,120
Net of fees, at 7.8x return on the engagement. Each additional inquiry is worth $1,470 at your close rate.
| Revenue added | $141,120 |
|---|---|
| Investment | $18,000 |
| Net | $123,120 |
| Return multiple | 7.8x |
Break-even
This engagement pays for itself at 1.0 additional inquiries per month. Everything above that is return.
This is a planning model, not a projection. It multiplies your own inputs and assumes nothing about what we will deliver. We publish it because the arithmetic should be yours to check before you spend anything.
Start here
Find out where your govcon practice actually stands.
Every engagement opens with the Answer Audit. Forty queries, five engines, three runs each, and a written baseline. If the number is already good, we will tell you that and you will have spent the audit fee to stop worrying.